Camaro Forums   Camaro Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Members   Search   Forum FAQ   Contact CF   Sponsors
    Camaro News   Camaro Timeslips   Camaro Recalls   TSBs   Register   Login  

Engine time

  Printable Version
Camaro Forums >> Camaro Models >> 1st Generation >> Engine time Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Engine time - 5/25/2008 11:25:20 PM   
Stryker2

 

Posts: 2
Score: 0
Joined: 5/25/2008
Status: offline
Ok I'm new to the fourms and this is my first restoration project ever. I have a 68 camaro ss sitting with striped intirior and no engine..I want to start with the engine but I need some suggestions on what to drop in her..I was considering a 350SB but Im not shure about this. Any helpfull ideas?
Post #: 1
RE: Engine time - 5/26/2008 7:45:06 AM   
seeburg220

 

Posts: 9
Score: 0
Joined: 5/21/2008
Status: offline
I have similar aspirations as you.   I don't own a Camaro yet, but my plan is to find a fairly decent body and drop in a fuel injected GM crate engine, such as the small block "Ram Jet 350".  It's rated at 350 hp and 400 lbs torque.  9.4:1 compression.  I don't know the price of it, but I would suspect it would be around $5k-7k.  Here's a link to this engine on GM's website.  Good luck and keep us posted on what you decide.

Ram jet 350


< Message edited by seeburg220 -- 5/26/2008 7:54:47 AM >

(in reply to Stryker2)
Post #: 2
RE: Engine time - 5/26/2008 2:03:40 PM   
bragg3

 

Posts: 7
Score: 0
Joined: 4/23/2008
Status: offline
I also have a 68 RS with carb 350 (not original) and am thinking of going with a fuel injected down the road.  I have looked at the Ram Jet 350 online and at a place near by the price is right at $5000 plus or minus, here of late it has been $5200.  I dont know much about dropping it in but from some of the online info it seems to be an all inclusive crate motor minus motor mounts, adequate fuel supply and return etc.

(in reply to seeburg220)
Post #: 3
RE: Engine time - 5/27/2008 9:49:57 AM   
Stryker2

 

Posts: 2
Score: 0
Joined: 5/25/2008
Status: offline
Thank you Seeburg, but I am curious..whats tha max HP I could push that engine to?I know its impossible to give a perfect number but an estimate?

(in reply to bragg3)
Post #: 4
RE: Engine time - 5/27/2008 10:57:53 AM   
cplthomas



Posts: 2556
Score: -2
Joined: 10/15/2006
From: Upstate NY, stupid Army... Stupid transfer..
Status: offline
cplthomas's photo gallery
Guys, before you go too deep into this, mind you I am not try to de-sway any one, whatever number you come up with on the project....multiply by 2.5.

The new motor will need all new parts.  And a fuel delivery system.  New ront end to handle the mill, new rear to handle the mill, next thing you know you will be calling paint shops about estimates.  And the list goes on.

Unless you guys have money to spend - in which case disregard what I just said.

The 68 SS had a few engine options, since yours is a rolling chassis I would worry about making a 'period correct' restoration.  This will be more of a custom resto.  The 350 SBC will work fine, the rear will handle the tourque and the front suspention will handle the weight.  But you will want to upgrade that stuff soon anyways, it is fourty years old after all.

The biggest question is: what are your plans for the ride?  Racer, pro-street, touring..etc...?

_____________________________

Urramaich a eorna
Land of the free because of the brave.
*warning* I dont care about spelling and spell things the way they sound.
these -> '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' <- are my favorite.

(in reply to Stryker2)
Post #: 5
RE: Engine time - 5/30/2008 8:19:35 AM   
seeburg220

 

Posts: 9
Score: 0
Joined: 5/21/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cplthomas

Guys, before you go too deep into this, mind you I am not try to de-sway any one, whatever number you come up with on the project....multiply by 2.5.

The new motor will need all new parts.  And a fuel delivery system.  New ront end to handle the mill, new rear to handle the mill, next thing you know you will be calling paint shops about estimates.  And the list goes on.

Unless you guys have money to spend - in which case disregard what I just said.

The 68 SS had a few engine options, since yours is a rolling chassis I would worry about making a 'period correct' restoration.  This will be more of a custom resto.  The 350 SBC will work fine, the rear will handle the tourque and the front suspention will handle the weight.  But you will want to upgrade that stuff soon anyways, it is fourty years old after all.

The biggest question is: what are your plans for the ride?  Racer, pro-street, touring..etc...?


Using the RamJet as an example, it's about $5000+/-, is  350hp / 400lbs torque.   Unless the car is already in need of  front end work, I don't see you needing to spend  money on non-engine stuff.  This  crate motor comes complete, from what I've  read.  You need to  install an electric fuel pump and lines, but other than that, it seems to be a true drop-in engine.  A drawback to this particular engine, is the computer control is taken from a marine application, and is sealed.  Re-programming it does not sound like it's easy to do or even possible, so what you get it what you get.   I like what I've read about it, and am considering it for a future project, unless the exisiting motor is fine to begin with.

(in reply to cplthomas)
Post #: 6
RE: Engine time - 5/30/2008 9:13:00 AM   
cplthomas



Posts: 2556
Score: -2
Joined: 10/15/2006
From: Upstate NY, stupid Army... Stupid transfer..
Status: offline
cplthomas's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: seeburg220

quote:

ORIGINAL: cplthomas

Guys, before you go too deep into this, mind you I am not try to de-sway any one, whatever number you come up with on the project....multiply by 2.5.

The new motor will need all new parts.  And a fuel delivery system.  New ront end to handle the mill, new rear to handle the mill, next thing you know you will be calling paint shops about estimates.  And the list goes on.

Unless you guys have money to spend - in which case disregard what I just said.

The 68 SS had a few engine options, since yours is a rolling chassis I would worry about making a 'period correct' restoration.  This will be more of a custom resto.  The 350 SBC will work fine, the rear will handle the tourque and the front suspention will handle the weight.  But you will want to upgrade that stuff soon anyways, it is fourty years old after all.

The biggest question is: what are your plans for the ride?  Racer, pro-street, touring..etc...?


Using the RamJet as an example, it's about $5000+/-, is  350hp / 400lbs torque.   Unless the car is already in need of  front end work, I don't see you needing to spend  money on non-engine stuff.  This  crate motor comes complete, from what I've  read.  You need to  install an electric fuel pump and lines, but other than that, it seems to be a true drop-in engine.  A drawback to this particular engine, is the computer control is taken from a marine application, and is sealed.  Re-programming it does not sound like it's easy to do or even possible, so what you get it what you get.   I like what I've read about it, and am considering it for a future project, unless the exisiting motor is fine to begin with.



I was thinking more along the lines of the ecm.  If it is a non emissions car you should be good.  But if it comes with a cumputer you will need to install o2 sensors.....etc.  But like you said, if the current motor is fine, its always cheaper and easier to keep it and build from what you already have.

Good luck to both of you eithe way, keep us posted.

_____________________________

Urramaich a eorna
Land of the free because of the brave.
*warning* I dont care about spelling and spell things the way they sound.
these -> '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' <- are my favorite.

(in reply to seeburg220)
Post #: 7
RE: Engine time - 6/7/2008 7:05:52 AM   
camrykid07


Posts: 21
Score: 0
Joined: 10/5/2007
Status: offline
ive looked into putting an ls1 or ls2 into my camaro, but with the ecm and all you have to put in throttle position and all kinds of stuff its really a headache,

(in reply to cplthomas)
Post #: 8
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]


 
Camaro >> Camaro Models >> 1st Generation
Jump to:


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
z28pete5575
spectergt2604223
madmikez284186
95slvrz283155
02stangt3009
74454bb2749
cplthomas2556
bluovlh8er2469
blade2300
spartan662261

New Vendors
Borla Performance industries
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
MagnaFlow Performance Exhaust

Camaro Forums .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.