RE: 1997 z28 upgrades
Login | |
|
RE: 1997 z28 upgrades - 7/5/2008 3:21:36 AM
|
|
|
cbr600rx7
Posts: 1216
Score: 0 Joined: 5/1/2007 From: Fort Brag NC (some where in iraq) Status: online
|
The 4.10s shoud not be too bad with the 6 speed. You will see a little drop but not as bad as a A4 would. I would say hold off on the cam and intake manifold. You are on the right track with the exhaust and headers. As said above i would spend a little extra and get away from the Pacesetters. If you are going with a cam i would spend the extra 100 bucks and get the real thing plus valve springs (about 240 bucks) instead of the LT4 intake. With a full exhaust, intake, 4.10 gears, good clutch, a small cam with valve springs, and a tune you will notice a huge diffrence. With traction you should be well into the low 13s or even high 12s depending on the tune and cam.
_____________________________
CHEAP, FAST, RELIABLE YOU CAN ONLY PICK TWO RED 00 346 LS1 .60 trim, Methanol, Patriot duel springs, 228/234 114LSA, 3" empire Driveshaft, 15"prostars, TCI 4500 Stall. Black 99 (3.8 DD) Whisper Lid, K&N, Magnaflow exhaust, 17"polished wheel
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 1997 z28 upgrades - 7/5/2008 11:37:15 AM
|
|
|
jamesjunk
Posts: 22
Score: 0 Joined: 10/24/2007 Status: offline
|
I would suggest the edelbrock lt1 intake over the lt4, as was stated the lt1 isnt realy worth the bang for the buck, I have not tried the edelbrock intake but with the air gap it should get less heat sinkage that the stock one.
|
|
|
|
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
Make A Donation
Forum Rules & FAQ
RSS Feeds
Camaro Prices
Chevy Camaro
Camaro concept car
1969 Camaro
Advertising Info
|
Contact Us |
Advertising |
CamaroForums.com Partners |
Camaro Links |
Archive |
About Us |
Link To Us |
Legal |
Privacy Policy |
© Camaro Forums
Camaro Forums .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.
|