RE: 00 trans am vs new stang gt
Login  | |
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 00 trans am vs new stang gt - 10/6/2008 1:32:32 PM
|
|
|
cbr600rx7
Posts: 1410
Joined: 5/1/2007
From: Fort Brag NC (some where in iraq)
Status: offline
|
around 260ish is normal for the stock 3 valve GT. There are a few freaks that dyno a bit higher but for the most part they will fall in the 260-270 range.
_____________________________
CHEAP, FAST, RELIABLE YOU CAN ONLY PICK TWO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 00 trans am vs new stang gt - 10/6/2008 9:52:38 PM
|
|
|
carguy_z28
Posts: 657
Joined: 3/23/2008
Status: offline
|
probably a clutch issue with the TA. Or he let him win lol
_____________________________
a true hotrodder would''''''''nt be content untill he had created a car so violent, so totally sick that the act of dropping the hammer could result in instant death.
*1974 Z28 N.O.S fed * 1995 Z28 M6 * 2007 F350 6.0 TD
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 00 trans am vs new stang gt - 10/7/2008 5:49:15 AM
|
|
|
7STANG
Posts: 34
Joined: 5/30/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nessy
quote:
ORIGINAL: 98ss4REAL
yeah a couple friends both m6 cars, just the stang actually amazed me
A $12,000 8 year old car beat a $40,000 1 year old car, and you''''re impressed with the stang?
Sorry brother there is no way a Mustang costs $40,000. A GT500 can be had for the $42,000-$44,000 range. I paid $24,500 brand new for mine.
_____________________________
07 MUSTANG GT, C&L CAI, 93 TUNE, 5 SPEED MANUAL
95 CAMARO Z28 - GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 00 trans am vs new stang gt - 10/7/2008 6:08:46 AM
|
|
|
7STANG
Posts: 34
Joined: 5/30/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: carguy_z28
probably a clutch issue with the TA. Or he let him win lol
Totally agree, or the guy couldn''t drive. No way a S197 is going to jump three car lengths on a LS1.
_____________________________
07 MUSTANG GT, C&L CAI, 93 TUNE, 5 SPEED MANUAL
95 CAMARO Z28 - GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 00 trans am vs new stang gt - 10/7/2008 11:17:13 PM
|
|
|
armynatguard18
Posts: 325
Joined: 9/5/2007
Status: offline
|
600, are you talking about rwhp or to the crank cuz they''re 3v''s are rated at 300
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 00 trans am vs new stang gt - 10/8/2008 6:26:43 AM
|
|
|
7STANG
Posts: 34
Joined: 5/30/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: armynatguard18
600, are you talking about rwhp or to the crank cuz they''''re 3v''''s are rated at 300
Yeah, he is talking rwhp. I dyno''d 261rwhp and 280rwtq stock and 282rwhp and 299rwtq after the cai and tune. My car is a 5 speed manual. An auto would do a little lower.
_____________________________
07 MUSTANG GT, C&L CAI, 93 TUNE, 5 SPEED MANUAL
95 CAMARO Z28 - GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 00 trans am vs new stang gt - 10/19/2008 8:06:09 PM
|
|
|
Nessy
Posts: 132
Joined: 6/16/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 7STANG
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nessy
quote:
ORIGINAL: 98ss4REAL
yeah a couple friends both m6 cars, just the stang actually amazed me
A $12,000 8 year old car beat a $40,000 1 year old car, and you''''''''re impressed with the stang?
Sorry brother there is no way a Mustang costs $40,000. A GT500 can be had for the $42,000-$44,000 range. I paid $24,500 brand new for mine.
The MSRP on the 08''s is what, like 29k? The dealers still jack that price up a couple grand. Then your looking at a ****ty ass interest rate with taxes and all the licensing fees, etc. I''m sure most people buying them now end up paying about 35 grand when all is said and done. I was being generous with the 00 trans am too, you can pick one of those up for 6 grand not 12
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
 Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
Make A Donation
Forum Rules & FAQ
RSS Feeds
Camaro Prices
Chevy Camaro
Camaro concept car
1969 Camaro
Advertising Info
|
Contact Us |
Advertising |
CamaroForums.com Partners |
Camaro Links |
Archive |
About Us |
Link To Us |
Legal |
Privacy Policy |
© Camaro Forums
Camaro Forums .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.
|
Printable Version
