RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

Camaro Forums Camaro Classifieds Photo Gallery Members Search Forum FAQ Contact CF Sponsors
Camaro News Camaro Timeslips Camaro Recalls TSBs Register Login

RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

Printable Version

Camaro >> Racing / Recreational >> Street/Strip >> RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Camaro Forums Sponsor

Street/Strip Forum Sponsored by MagnaFlow.

Login
Message << Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra - 8/12/2005 4:45:29 PM

nj02z28ls1

Posts: 26
Joined: 8/9/2005
Status: offline it takes more hp to turn a auto than a man trans

(in reply to aaronsirocz)

Post #: 21

RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra - 8/17/2005 8:41:55 PM

wantals1camaro

Posts: 4
Joined: 8/15/2005
Status: offline u should dust them the 96 gt was pretty much the slowest year ever made and there aren't that much of a difference between a gt and cobra and believe me i have a mustang. and as u can tell by my screen name what i really want lol

(in reply to nj02z28ls1)

Post #: 22

RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra - 8/19/2005 10:13:11 PM

aaronsirocz

Posts: 108
Joined: 8/9/2005
Status: offline
well except for the new cobra and gt there is about a 130 hp difference between the two now

_____________________________

(in reply to wantals1camaro)

Post #: 23

RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra - 8/20/2005 2:04:34 PM

wantals1camaro

Posts: 4
Joined: 8/15/2005
Status: offline yea but the o3-04 cobra are supercharged 96 cobra are completely out of that range even with the PI swap because of the eaton/ or sometimes kb superchargers

(in reply to aaronsirocz)

Post #: 24

RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra - 8/23/2005 10:57:25 PM

nj02z28ls1

Posts: 26
Joined: 8/9/2005
Status: offline the one statement about the slowest stang, sorry it was the 1993 cars before the body change, ford put a smaller cam in the cars to make the epa standards for that year so they did not have to pay any fines to the epa on the new stadards for 1993. i bought one in november of 92 and it was a piece of ****. i traded a 1990 coupe body with the gt-40 iron heads and intake. ford had them rated at 205 hp let me tell ya i do not think it was close. i traded it 14 months later and only put 3500 miles on it. (shame on you ford)

(in reply to wantals1camaro)

Post #: 25

RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra - 8/23/2005 11:51:30 PM

JD1969

Posts: 1677
Joined: 6/3/2005
Status: offline
The Cobra being the exception, the 96,97 and 98 4.6 cars were the worst of the GT's. Go on any Stang board and ask.

_____________________________

2001 SS A4
11.500 @ 116.01
SLP Lid/Granitelli Maf/Fernco/JD1969 custom cat back/UMI Lower Control Arms and PHR/Flowtechs/TSP Cam/Yank 4000 stall

(in reply to nj02z28ls1)

Post #: 26

RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra - 8/27/2005 3:59:46 AM

93stanglx

Posts: 5
Joined: 8/27/2005
Status: offline The cobra should take him if i understand the camaro is 285 stock and the cobra is 305 stock,Plus the cobra is a manuel and you are an automatic, Auto shifts quicker but manuel could redline and go through gears higher...

It would be a good race though....

And The cobra engine and the GT engine are different engines who ever asked that

_____________________________

MustangMagic tuned 394.2 RWHP-398.4 RWTQ
-Vortech supercharged V2-SQ
-Vortech intercooled V2-SQ
-3.73 gears
-Flowmaster catbacks
-Mac o/r h-pipe

(in reply to JD1969)

Post #: 27

RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra - 10/3/2005 10:05:34 AM

ponypleasure5.0

Posts: 2
Joined: 10/2/2005
Status: offline ok well the cobra is rather quick with its 305 hp and 300 ft lbs of tq itdoes 0 to 60 in 5.9 second and a top speed of 152mph
o yeah i almost forgot its a ford

_____________________________

302 smokin the 350

(in reply to aaronsirocz)

Post #: 28

RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra - 10/3/2005 5:46:28 PM

85Camarodude

Posts: 116
Joined: 5/8/2005
From: NC
Status: offline
im not sure about the regular cobras but the 96 mystic cobra runs a 1/4 in 14 seconds according to this website http://fast-autos.net/ford/fordmysticcobra.html

thats the special edition one so im guessing the regular cobra would be worse or the same

correct me if im wrong

< Message edited by 85Camarodude -- 10/3/2005 5:51:52 PM >

(in reply to aaronsirocz)

Post #: 29

RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra - 10/3/2005 6:38:45 PM

85Camarodude

Posts: 116
Joined: 5/8/2005
From: NC
Status: offline
http://www.stangbangers.com/GT_vs_CamaroZ28_Article2.htm

the 94 camaro z28 ran 14.1 seconds in a 1/4 mile

it all depends really on the source but for the most part the cobras are runnin 14 seconds and the camaro z28 is runnin 14 seconds to 14.1 seconds

very close times, as far as im concerned its a tie

the 94 z28 vs the 94 gt on the other hand is no competition, the z28 blows it away hands down according to car and driver

< Message edited by 85Camarodude -- 10/3/2005 6:40:31 PM >

(in reply to 85Camarodude)

Post #: 30

Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>