RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times

Camaro Forums Camaro Classifieds Photo Gallery Members Search Forum FAQ Contact CF Sponsors
Camaro News Camaro Timeslips Camaro Recalls TSBs Register Login

RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times

Printable Version

Camaro >> Racing / Recreational >> Street/Strip >> RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Camaro Forums Sponsor

Street/Strip Forum Sponsored by MagnaFlow.

Login
Message << Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times - 4/16/2007 5:08:37 PM

BigNic

Posts: 1393
Joined: 1/23/2007
Status: offline
dows you have a cai and upgraded exaughst right so what your talking about is trading a much better car with 5 more horse for a car with 5k less miles and 5 less horse.....hate to tell you bud but youd be losing a small chunck of pwer and a big chunck of respect

(in reply to z28scorpio)

Post #: 21

RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times - 4/16/2007 5:33:32 PM

DOWS1997RS

Posts: 40
Joined: 1/22/2007
Status: offline ok wouldnt a 5.0 GT crush my car?,,, dont it keep with with Z28's, i thought i was makin a upgrade in power?....This is the one i might trade for

< Message edited by DOWS1997RS -- 4/16/2007 5:39:23 PM >

(in reply to BigNic)

Post #: 22

RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times - 4/16/2007 6:50:29 PM

badinfluenceRS

Posts: 1793
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline Well that one doesn't look too bad...

The stang will be faster, more hp, more tq, lighter car....

What I was getting at it's not that big of an upgrade power wise...I'd go with which car you think looks better...

btw, the Camaro will handle better i think

EDIT: According to my 1/4 site...the 1993 GT runs a 16.1...that may be wrong, I dont see why it wouldn't be faster than our 3.8's

< Message edited by badinfluenceRS -- 4/16/2007 6:51:41 PM >

_____________________________

1999 Camaro Z28 - LS1 / A4

(in reply to DOWS1997RS)

Post #: 23

RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times - 4/16/2007 8:41:10 PM

bluovlh8er

Posts: 2418
Joined: 1/28/2007
Status: offline you know i was just thinking. the 3.8 is a good running motor... i wouldnt say fast, but pretty snappy when floored.

(in reply to BigNic)

Post #: 24

RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times - 4/16/2007 8:54:15 PM

badinfluenceRS

Posts: 1793
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline plus it's a rock solid engine...it was on the Wards Top Ten Engine list for 4 years...amoung Porsche, BMW, and Caddy Northstar and other great engines...

_____________________________

1999 Camaro Z28 - LS1 / A4

(in reply to bluovlh8er)

Post #: 25

RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times - 4/16/2007 9:26:02 PM

bluovlh8er

Posts: 2418
Joined: 1/28/2007
Status: offline see infuence i stuck up for em................

(in reply to badinfluenceRS)

Post #: 26

RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times - 4/16/2007 9:26:24 PM

bluovlh8er

Posts: 2418
Joined: 1/28/2007
Status: offline the 3.8's

(in reply to bluovlh8er)

Post #: 27

RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times - 4/16/2007 9:27:23 PM

badinfluenceRS

Posts: 1793
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline good job man...enjoy what you have...until you have money

_____________________________

1999 Camaro Z28 - LS1 / A4

(in reply to bluovlh8er)

Post #: 28

RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times - 4/16/2007 10:28:16 PM

coprunr

Posts: 342
Joined: 2/11/2007
Status: offline
a bone stock 5.0 car is a dog....i have seen them get their ass handed to them by 3.1V6 5spd Cavaliers. the advantage to the Fox body is upgrades...the 5.0 Fox body is endlessly upgradeable and easy to make a fast car..but stock they were dogs

_____________________________

as i walk through the valley of rice
i shall fear no import
for i know torque is with me

(in reply to badinfluenceRS)

Post #: 29

RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times - 4/18/2007 2:33:50 AM

Hisss04Cobra

Posts: 501
Joined: 10/23/2005
Status: offline O Rly?

_____________________________

(in reply to coprunr)

Post #: 30

Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>