Camaro Forums   Camaro Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Members   Search   Forum FAQ   Contact CF   Sponsors
    Camaro News   Camaro Timeslips   Camaro Recalls   TSBs   Register   Login  

1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger?

  Printable Version
Camaro >> Camaro Models >> 4th Generation >> V8 Tech >> LS1 Camaro >> 1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger? Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger? - 5/8/2007 7:47:04 PM   
davidfarah

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline
Hey guys just taking opinions on which is faster and safer...turbo or supercharger?
Post #: 1
RE: 1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger? - 5/11/2007 6:37:28 PM   
ronster

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 5/9/2007
Status: offline
Turrbo HP is free HP. Supercharger HP loss on a centrifugal is roughly 12-15%. On a roots, screw or hybrid roots the loss could be as high as 25-30%. It uses HP to make HP. As far as wear and tear on the engine, the roots style blowers are instant on, and hit hard while the turbo and centrifugal S/C need to spool up and they make power gradually, so less of an impact on the engine.

Ron

(in reply to davidfarah)
Post #: 2
RE: 1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger? - 5/16/2007 4:24:23 PM   
ninetysixyenko


Posts: 2087
Joined: 5/11/2007
Status: offline
ninetysixyenko's photo gallery
turbo runs off exhaust and creates little HP on low end, but in high end can create double that of a super.  super like sated, takes HP to make HP, but is made more for low end snap, and is( in my opinion) best on engines that already have nice top end speed(v8s..) but they wont make near as much as a turbo(super also decreases fuel eco, turbo dont). you can always increase pulley size on super too, to make more power

_____________________________


DC-Sport Header Back Exhaust, Injen SRI, AEM Under Drive Pulleys, B&M Short-Throw, Big Brake Kit, Torque Dampener.
5% Tint All Around, Halo''''s

(in reply to davidfarah)
Post #: 3
RE: 1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger? - 5/16/2007 5:48:33 PM   
95slvrZ28

 


Caretaker of the Ban Hamster
Posts: 3155
Joined: 8/31/2006
Status: offline
95slvrZ28's photo gallery
A turbo doesn't decrease fuel economy from sapping power off the engine, but as soon as the turbo gets spooled, you're going to be using as much if not more fuel than if you had the super charger on there.  Remeber, the more air you pump into the cylinders, the more fuel you need. 

Oh, and there's no such thing as "free" horsepower, because that means that we could solve a world energy crisis with a turbo charger...Now a turbo is very efficent because it uses  waste heat to create power, but they also decrease exhaust flow.


_____________________________

Moroso CAI/Kooks 1 3/4 LT Headers/catted Y/!muffler/Hooker tips. 17X9.5 Chrome Z06 wheels

Exhaust clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WArqIB6esM

(in reply to ninetysixyenko)
Post #: 4
RE: 1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger? - 5/23/2007 9:57:40 AM   
bmx4884

 

Posts: 34
Joined: 2/21/2007
Status: offline
turbos tend to be safer because u get the boost slowly and u have less of a chance of blowin ur engine. say ur runnin 15 psi with a turbo u get it slowly and with a supercharger u get it as soon as u mash the gas. as far as fuel economy turbo is ur best bet cuz when ur just cruisin at low rpms the turbo isnt spinning fast so its almost like u dont have it. with a supercharger on the other hand ur always using it whether u want to or not. some superchargers have a pressure release valve type of deal where if ur stayin at low rpms it releases the extra pressure and saves a little mpg but IMO go for the turbo.

(in reply to davidfarah)
Post #: 5
RE: 1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger? - 7/1/2007 2:18:52 PM   
joker75

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 7/1/2007
Status: offline
First off turbos are not free power. They just restrict the exhaust to lose their power versus a supercharger losing it through the belt system. Second Turbos will tend to cause faster break down of the engine oil because engine oil is used to lubricate and cool the turbo. Most turbo manufacturers require you to use full-synthetic, and even if you already use full synthetic the added heat and friction from the turbo will necessitate changing the oil more frequently. Third turbos or centrifugal superchargers will have a lag on the low end as the compressor spins up, then most have a very sharp increase to full boost once this happens.

Superchargers in general will use a seperate oil source so they will not effect the engine oils life. Roots and Twin-screw type superchargers will build boost from just off idle, but produce it in a very linear manner avoiding the sudden onset of boost of a turbo or a centrifugal supercharger.

In short depending on what you would like to accomplish with your setup there are positives and negatives of both. A Roots or Twin-Screw supercharger will give you a linear boost level from idle to redline. A turbos and centrifugal chargers are usually capable of producing higher HP number top end, but will lack severely on the low end to get them. So if you want a steady linear boos try to find a twin-screw or roots type supercharger. I have not seen one for your SS, but there might be one out there. If you want the high numbers up top and are willing to sacrifice the low end to get it then by all means go with the turbo or centrifugal supercharger.

< Message edited by joker75 -- 7/1/2007 4:59:26 PM >

(in reply to bmx4884)
Post #: 6
RE: 1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger? - 7/1/2007 9:11:06 PM   
95slvrZ28

 


Caretaker of the Ban Hamster
Posts: 3155
Joined: 8/31/2006
Status: offline
95slvrZ28's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: joker75

First off turbos are not free power. They just restrict the exhaust to lose their power versus a supercharger losing it through the belt system. Second Turbos will tend to cause faster break down of the engine oil because engine oil is used to lubricate and cool the turbo. Most turbo manufacturers require you to use full-synthetic, and even if you already use full synthetic the added heat and friction from the turbo will necessitate changing the oil more frequently. Third turbos or centrifugal superchargers will have a lag on the low end as the compressor spins up, then most have a very sharp increase to full boost once this happens.

Superchargers in general will use a seperate oil source so they will not effect the engine oils life. Roots and Twin-screw type superchargers will build boost from just off idle, but produce it in a very linear manner avoiding the sudden onset of boost of a turbo or a centrifugal supercharger.

In short depending on what you would like to accomplish with your setup there are positives and negatives of both. A Roots or Twin-Screw supercharger will give you a linear boost level from idle to redline. A turbos and centrifugal chargers are usually capable of producing higher HP number top end, but will lack severely on the low end to get them. So if you want a steady linear boos try to find a twin-screw or roots type supercharger. I have not seen one for your SS, but there might be one out there. If you want the high numbers up top and are willing to sacrifice the low end to get it then by all means go with the turbo or centrifugal supercharger.
*claps* someone who gives good information!  yay! haha.  On the other hand, they do make roots/twin skrew superchargers for the LS1's in general(vettes), but you'll have to get a new hood and possibly do some modifying elsewhere.


_____________________________

Moroso CAI/Kooks 1 3/4 LT Headers/catted Y/!muffler/Hooker tips. 17X9.5 Chrome Z06 wheels

Exhaust clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WArqIB6esM

(in reply to joker75)
Post #: 7
RE: 1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger? - 7/3/2007 2:17:23 PM   
bluovlh8er

 


Posts: 2469
Joined: 1/28/2007
Status: offline
gut the cat

(in reply to davidfarah)
Post #: 8
RE: 1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger? - 7/12/2007 9:23:22 AM   
1970judge

 

Posts: 13
Joined: 7/10/2007
Status: offline
Neither is the "better" combo, my boss/tuner here loves turbo cars whereas  i love Procharger cars.  I believe you can always make that extra 10-15% with a turbo car however.

_____________________________

http://www.xhpsolutions.com/catalog/

(in reply to davidfarah)
Post #: 9
RE: 1999 SS...What's better..Turbo or supercharger? - 8/16/2007 4:31:09 AM   
chrshadil

 

Posts: 164
Joined: 3/6/2007
From: McCaysville, GA
Status: offline
I heard someone say my car has a turbo and a supercharger, would this setup work and what would the numbers be?

_____________________________



1994 Camaro Z28 - K&N Cold Air Intake, Flowmaster Cat-back Exhaust, Gutted Cat, MSD Opti Spark, and Trick Flow Intake elbow.

(in reply to 1970judge)
Post #: 10
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>


 
Camaro >> Camaro Models >> 4th Generation >> V8 Tech >> LS1 Camaro
Jump to:


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
z28pete5575
spectergt2604220
madmikez284186
95slvrz283155
02stangt3006
74454bb2749
cplthomas2556
bluovlh8er2469
blade2300
spartan662261

New Vendors
Borla Performance industries
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
MagnaFlow Performance Exhaust

Camaro Forums .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.